Comparative analysis of inoculation methods for inducing bacterial wilt in Ralstonia solanacearum susceptible tomato hosts

bacterial wilt inoculation methods

Authors

  • Emmanuel Ehinmitan Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences,Technology and Innovation, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya Author
  • Juma Patrick Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15241861

Keywords:

Ralstonia solanacearum , bacterial wilt, inoculation methods, disease progression , pathogen-host interactions , infection efficiency, disease severity

Abstract

Bacterial wilt, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, is a devastating vascular disease affecting a wide range of crops, including tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), with serious implications for global food security. Effective and reproducible inoculation methods are critical for understanding host-pathogen interactions, evaluating cultivar resistance, and developing disease management strategies. This study compared the efficiency of four common inoculation techniques—stem injection, root cutting, root dipping, and soil drenching—in inducing bacterial wilt in susceptible tomato plants under controlled greenhouse conditions. Parameters assessed included disease severity progression, infection rate, disease incidence, and pathogen recovery. Results showed that stem injection was the most effective method, producing 100% infection and the most rapid disease progression, with severe symptoms observed by 8 days post-inoculation (dpi). Root cutting also led to high infection (85%) and symptom development by 8 dpi. Root dipping resulted in moderate infection (75%) with slower progression, while soil drenching had the lowest infection rate (60%) and slowest disease development. Pathogen recovery rates mirrored these trends, with the highest recovery from stem-injected and root-cut plants. These findings highlight the significant influence of inoculation technique on disease development and underscore the need for standardized methods in bacterial wilt research to ensure accurate screening and reproducible results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Emmanuel Ehinmitan, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences,Technology and Innovation, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya

    Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology

  • Juma Patrick, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya

    Horticulture and Food Security Department

References

Álvarez B, Biosca EG, López MM (2010) On the life of Ralstonia solanacearum, a destructive bacterial plant pathogen. Curr Res Technol Educ Top Appl Microbiol Microb Biotechnol 1:267–279

Dey P, Sen SK (2023) a Review on Solanaceous Plant Diseases Caused By Ralstonia Solanacearum Having Serious Economic Impact. Plant Arch 23. https://doi.org/10.51470/plantarchives.2023.v23.no2.072

Dixon GR, Tilston EL (2010) Soil-borne pathogens and their interactions with the soil environment. Soil Microbiol Sustain Crop Prod 197–271

Elphinstone JG (2005) The current bacterial wilt situation: A global overview.

Fiedler K (2014) Integrated Approach to Understanding Tomato Sour Rot and Improving Disease Management on the Eastern Shore of Virginia

Genin S, Denny TP (2012) Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:67–89

Manda RR, Addanki VA, Srivastava S (2020) Bacterial wilt of solanaceous crops. Int J Chem Stud 8:1048–1057

Nion YA, Toyota K (2015) Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbes Environ 30:1–11

Prior P, Ailloud F, Dalsing BL, Remenant B, Sanchez B, Allen C (2016) Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species. BMC Genomics 17:1–11

Rivera-Zuluaga K, Hiles R, Barua P, Caldwell D, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS (2023) Getting to the root of Ralstonia invasion. In: Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. Elsevier, pp 3–12

Singh S, Singh Y, Singh V (2019) Divulging the comparing inoculation methods for assessing pathogenicity of Dickeya dadantii inciting stalk rot disease of sorghum. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 8:1409–1413

Soliman A, Gulden RH, Tambong JT, Bajracharya P, Adam LR, Xu R, Cott M, Daayf F (2018) Developed and validated inoculation and disease assessment methods for Goss’s bacterial wilt and leaf blight disease of corn. Crop Prot 112:159–167

Somodi GC, Jones JB, Scott JW (1993) Comparison of Inoculation Techniques for Screening Tomato Genotypes for Bacterial Wilt Resistance. In: Bacterial Wilt. Australian Centre For International Agricultural Research, pp 120–123

Xue H, Lozano-Durán R, Macho AP (2020) Insights into the root invasion by the plant pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum. Plants 9:516

Yadeta KA, J. Thomma BPH (2013) The xylem as battleground for plant hosts and vascular wilt pathogens. Front Plant Sci 4:97

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

Data Availability Statement

Data is publicly available 

How to Cite

Comparative analysis of inoculation methods for inducing bacterial wilt in Ralstonia solanacearum susceptible tomato hosts: bacterial wilt inoculation methods. (2025). Explore Crop Science, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15241861